🧠 Move Fast, Break Minds: The State of AI Security in 2025

The AI boom is in full swing. Whether it's chatbots, coding copilots, or generative art tools, artificial intelligence has gone from sci-fi to standard issue seemingly overnight. Tech giants, startups, and open-source communities are all racing to build the smartest, fastest, and flashiest models.

But while the world is busy marveling at what AI can do, fewer people are asking a more important question:

“How secure is any of this?” 🔒

As a cybersecurity professional, I’ve seen this story before. Innovation moves fast. Security scrambles to keep up. Corners get cut—not because developers are lazy, but because the system rewards shipping over safety.

And with AI? The risks are exponential.

🧪 Why Developers Are Cutting Corners

Let’s get one thing straight: most devs want to build secure systems. But in the AI space, they’re facing some brutal realities:

In short, the industry is sprinting, and even well-meaning developers are being told to ignore the potholes on the track.

According to a 2024 CNBC analysis, companies are increasingly aware of the risks—but still feel pressure to deploy AI before their competitors do. Many cite unclear regulations, unknown security exposure, and lack of staff expertise as blockers to doing it safely. But those blockers often get bypassed in the race to innovate.

This is how we end up with models in production that no one has red-teamed, hallucinating code or leaking sensitive training data—because not deploying often feels riskier to the business than deploying fast and patching later.

🧨 Emerging AI Security Risks

1. 💬 Prompt Injection & Jailbreaking

LLMs are like improv actors—they take your input and try to continue the scene. But what if a malicious user tricks the model into ignoring its guardrails?

In 2024, researchers demonstrated that OpenAI’s ChatGPT search functionality was vulnerable to prompt injection. By embedding hidden instructions in webpages, attackers could manipulate the model’s outputs—causing it to summarize false or misleading content as if it were legitimate.

In 2025, researchers showed that DeepSeek’s new LLM, R1, failed 100% of jailbreak attempts, generating toxic, unethical, and harmful responses without resistance. Despite claims of safety alignment, the model was easily manipulated—exposing how fragile many safeguards really are.

Prompt injection doesn’t need admin access. It just needs clever phrasing. And when models trust input blindly, it doesn’t take much to steer them off the rails.

2. 🧪 Adversarial Inputs & Data Poisoning

Small tweaks to inputs—like a pixel change in an image or a subtle misspelling—can trick models into misclassifying completely.

And worse: if you train on poisoned data, you’re building on a broken foundation.

In 2022, Google’s image classification AI was tricked into identifying a turtle as a rifle due to adversarial perturbations. While subtle to the human eye, these changes exploited learned associations in the model’s training data.

A Chinese firm manipulated environmental cues to deceive a Tesla vehicle’s AI system, tricking it into veering into oncoming traffic. The attack leveraged poisoned training assumptions to subvert real-world behavior—illustrating the deadly potential of poisoned data in autonomous systems.

You don’t need to break the model—you just need to quietly influence what it learns.

3. 🧠 Model Leakage & Inference Attacks

If your AI was trained on private or proprietary data, that data might still be recoverable—intentionally or not.

In 2023, Samsung employees unintentionally leaked confidential code and internal data into ChatGPT while using it for debugging. Once submitted, the data became part of OpenAI’s training pipeline, raising major concerns about information reuse and model memory.

That same year, Microsoft AI researchers accidentally exposed 38TB of internal data—including passwords and Teams messages—via a misconfigured Azure Storage URL tied to open-source AI work.

These weren’t hackers—they were developers trying to move fast. And in both cases, the AI environment became the breach vector.

Remember: These models don’t forget unless you make them. And your training data isn’t safe just because your firewall is.

4. 🧑‍⚖️ Overtrusting AI Output

AI is great at sounding confident. That’s not the same as being correct.

This isn’t just a UX problem—it’s a security liability. Especially when it leads to bad code in prod, faulty legal advice, or false information that goes unchecked.

A 2023 MIT Sloan Management Review article highlights how users often overestimate AI's accuracy and decision-making power, even in the face of contradictory evidence. This overtrust can lead to automation bias, blind delegation, and worse: institutional overreliance on systems that were never designed to be 100% reliable.

The solution isn’t just to make AI more accurate—it’s to build systems that signal uncertainty, include human oversight, and avoid pretending the model is something it’s not.

5. 💔 Emotional Exploitation & Blackmail Vectors

AI companion tools and romantic chatbots are gaining massive popularity—apps like Replika, EVA AI, and other LLM-powered avatars that simulate romantic intimacy. But these aren’t just harmless flirt bots. The risks here are deeply personal—and dangerously underregulated.

There are no widely enforced regulations requiring:

This creates a disturbing potential for AI-fueled sextortion, particularly among lonely or emotionally vulnerable individuals. And if minors are involved, the risks escalate even more dramatically.

In December 2022, the FBI issued a national public safety alert warning about an increase in sextortion schemes targeting children and teens. AI-generated personas could amplify that threat by automating grooming tactics or scaling deception across platforms.

These aren't just hypotheticals—real-world examples are already here:

In 2023, the FBI warned that scammers were using AI to create deepfake explicit videos from publicly available photos, then blackmailing victims with fabricated content. That same year, scammers began creating AI-generated fake news videos that falsely accused people of crimes to extort or intimidate them. In Australia, a woman became a victim of deepfake pornography created without her consent, illustrating the emotional and reputational toll such technology can have.

The risk assessment is both high-impact and high-likelihood. The tools to cause this kind of harm are cheap, public, and spreading fast. In most models this would translate to a Critical priority risk

We’re heading into a future where emotional trust in AI could be used as a weapon—and we’re not ready for the consequences.

🤖 AI Is a Double-Edged Sword for Security

AI is both weapon and shield.

But the bad guys have access to these tools too.

The UK's National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) warns that AI is supercharging cyber threats—accelerating phishing, misinformation, and automation of sophisticated attacks.

🛡️ Minimum Viable Security for AI Projects

Here’s the bare minimum checklist:

ISACA highlights how AI is outpacing security norms. We need consistent frameworks and real security-by-design.

⚖️ The Regulatory Horizon (and Developer Whiplash)

AI regulation isn’t just coming—it’s already here in some regions, and on the way in others. But like everything else in this space, it’s moving fast, unevenly, and often without the technical clarity that developers need.

🌍 Current Ratified Regulations

US United States – Fragmented but Evolving

The U.S. has no federal AI law yet, but several key agencies have issued guidance (NIST, FTC, White House Office of Science & Technology Policy). States like California, Colorado, and Illinois are introducing AI-specific bills.
Read more →

🗂️ AI, Privacy Laws, and Data Subject Rights

AI security isn't just about preventing breaches—it's also about legal compliance. Regulations such as the GDPR (Europe) and CCPA (California) consider training data as personal data when it includes identifiable information.

If a user submits their information to an AI model—like uploading a document or interacting with a chatbot—and later files a Data Subject Access Request (DSAR), the organization may be legally required to locate, report, or delete that data.

Organizations utilizing personal data in training, fine-tuning, or inference processes need to:

In 2024, California clarified that LLMs storing or generating personal information must honor deletion and access requests—even for inferred data. (oag.ca.gov)

AI isn't exempt from privacy laws; if anything, it's at the forefront of regulatory scrutiny.

🤯 The Developer’s Dilemma

For developers and product teams, this fragmented landscape creates uncertainty:

It's no surprise that devs and decision-makers often feel stuck: build fast and take the risk, or wait for clarity and fall behind.

🔚 In Closing: Eyes Open, Systems Locked

AI is rewriting the rules of software—and security can’t afford to be an afterthought.

We need:

🚨 The AI revolution isn’t coming. It’s already here. Let’s make sure it doesn’t blow up in our faces.

Thanks for reading! Want to chat about AI, attack surfaces, or adversarial Pokémon strategies? I’m always game. 🛡️⚔️ """

Note: All thoughts presented are my own and not a representation of the opinions of any employer

Backlinks